Empire Center for
  Public Policy


Manhattan Institute
  for Policy Research

Fiscal Watch Memos

Payroll Watch Archive


Enter your e-mail address to receive notifications when there are new posts




July 9, 2010

Liquidating the MTA (or at least the buses)

Nicole Gelinas

Baruch’s E.S. Savas has a good piece in today’s Post on introducing competitive contracting to the New York City and downstate public-bus system. As the MTA cuts routes, the state, the MTA, the city, or some combination thereof should bundle the axed routes and put them out to bid to private-sector contractors, who would compete on providing services for the lowest subsidy. The government would continue to set fares, stops, and safety rules, but not bus-driver or support-staff wages.

Savas and E.J. McMahon did a great study on the topic of competitive contracting a few years back, finding that a 20 percent cost reduction — a reasonable estimate in light of Europe’s savings on similar initiatives — would save $340 million annually, nearly the amount of the MTA’s current operating deficit.

There’s another advantage to bus-service contracting, too. Weakening the MTA’s monopoly on nearly all transit services would mean that the MTA’s unions don’t have as strong a hold on New York’s economy. Subway workers could go on strike, but buses would still run, like in London.

Please read more about why buses are a good candidate for contracting — as opposed to, say, subway lines — here. And read Savas’s piece in City Journal’s special 2009 New York issue here (it’s in the first orange box).

Filed under: The MTA

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.



Empire Center for Public Policy
P.O. Box 7113 - Albany, New York 12224
phone: 518-434-3100