Home

Empire Center for
  Public Policy


Categories

Manhattan Institute
  for Policy Research

Fiscal Watch Memos

Payroll Watch Archive


   

Enter your e-mail address to receive notifications when there are new posts

 

 

 

April 13, 2011


Cuomo makes a promising(?) deal

E.J. McMahon

Gov. Andrew Cuomo has just announced a tentative contract agreement with one of the state’s smaller unions, including some potentially significant labor concessions that could set a pattern for achieving the $450 million in workforce savings assumed in the new state budget.

Based on the governor’s press release, key aspects of the deal with Law Enforcement Council 82 include the following:

  • a three-year pay freeze on pay, including longevity step increments;
  • an increase in employee share of health insurance premiums, from 10 percent to 20 percent for individual coverage, and from 25 percent to 35 percent for family coverage;
  • new co-pays for hospital services and medical visits, and encouragement of mail-order prescription drug refills;
  • a reduction in the amount of sick time that can be credited to health insurance for retired employees; and
  • exclusion of sick days from accrual of time worked for purposes of qualifying for overtime compensation.

Council 82 had been one of the few remaining holdouts from the 2007-11 state contract cycle, when major unions including CSEA and PEF agreed to base pay hikes of 14 percent, plus some extras.  As reward for their concessions going forward, Council 82 members will retroactively get the same settlement for that period.

Council 82 is a relatively small union, covering 1,160 State University police, Park Police, Department of Environmental Conservation Officers and Forest Rangers. If other state unions make the same concessions, what the governor projects as “system-wide” savings would add up to $430 million — including $178 million for the increase in health insurance premiums, $196 million from the change sin co-pays and prescription drug refill, $45 million from the change in sick-leave credit and $11 million from the overtime reform. At least it would appear that way, assuming the term “system-wide” is translated to mean “if the same changes applied to the entire state workforce.” Indeed, on a statewide basis, a freeze on step increments would save another $140 million a year for as long as it lasts.

A key unanswered question: State labor contracts usually have a duration of four years, but the governor’s news release describes a pay freeze that lasts for three years.  So what’s the term of the Council 82 deal? Any back-loaded goodies in there?  ** UPDATE: A journalistic source quotes the governor’s office as saying it’s a three-year contract. That’s another big plus for Cuomo — because if steps aren’t included in the agreement when it expires, there will be no Triborough effect. **

The health insurance savings seem genuinely significant, with those “system-wide” numbers amounting to a 19 percent savings for taxpayers in this category (i.e., premiums for active employees). The sick leave credit is less impressive, amounting to just over 3 percent of the $1.3 billion the state will spend on retiree health care in 2011-12. However, the governor has more running room on this, since unions in the past have agreed to study the possibility of changing the eligibility guidelines for retiree health care.

The missing details will determine whether, on balance, this a major breakthrough. Based on what’s been released so far, it may be a promising pattern.

P.S. — Anonymous commentator “Park Cop” (#5 below) points out an error in my original post: Council 82 was not a holdout in the 2007-11 contract round, but had been without a contract since 2005.  There’s obviously a longer back-story hereNo doubt an interesting one.

5 Comments »

  1. Great news, its about time the taxpayers got a break. Someone once said [hard times
    require bold decissions] Cuomo is on the right coarse.

    Comment by Tony F — April 13, 2011 @ 7:55 pm

  2. This is all PR from the Cuomo Propaganda Machine !!! The Unions will just wait Cuomo out !!!

    Comment by eatingdogfood — April 13, 2011 @ 8:49 pm

  3. This idea is disgusting. I’m sorry that I supported Cuomo. Union workers are not the cause of this mess. It is greedy pigs who peddle nothing on Wall Street, chairmen of large corporations and other high paid do nothings who had “visions” of how they personally could profit without contributing a thing. Now, along with highly paid media consultants, they are trying to flip the responsibility on to working people. Union members don’t have “vision”; they perform service for everyone. They now get middle class salaries. The idea of raising their contibutions for health care and taking sick days and freezing salaries is all part of overpaid undertaxed millionaires’ vision. It will not change the deficit much, but it will continue to furnish their mansions. Union workers will be reduced to lower class. I believe we need to pay more in taxes, especially the wealthy. We need to keep people working. Park rangers, janitors, secretaries, teachers, people working at the DMV, and in offices at Social Services are not the cause of this mess and cannot cure it. Pharmecutical company chairmen, insurance company chairmen and even ball players and actors must pay their fair share. Their salaries have not gone down at all. They need to share the pain…for them it wouldn’t even be a twinge.

    Comment by Sue B — April 14, 2011 @ 10:43 am

  4. This union is not a hold out. Until this tentative agreement the State has never made any offer other than 0% raises for the 2005-2007 time period. Now we are faced with a contract in hard times when we were forced to go to perb for the state to allow us to go to binding arbitration. The dedicated member of thus unit have been working without a contract for over 6 years. We have already done our part and now will probably be forced to do more than any other unit. Accepting what may turn out to be no pay increase at all after 6 years of stalled negotiations. Please look at the history of these negotiations before you judge the members of the ALES unit. While the rest of the state enjoyed prosperity we did not. Do not blame the states mismanagement on labor and look closely at all aspects of state spending

    Comment by Park Cop — April 14, 2011 @ 6:43 pm

  5. We did not hold out. We were only recently allowed to go to arbitration for 2005-2007.

    Comment by Park Cop — April 14, 2011 @ 6:46 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

 

 
 

Empire Center for Public Policy
P.O. Box 7113 - Albany, New York 12224
phone: 518-434-3100