Governor Paterson’s proposed “obesity tax” on sugared soft drinks has already captured most of the media attention among the $4 billion in new taxes and fees in Governor Paterson’s budget.  But by far the largest single element in Paterson’s revenue package is a $652 million increase in the state’s existing “assessment” on utilities.  Any such increase will ultimately be borne by utility ratepayers, adding $652 million to what are already some of the highest energy costs in the nation.

The assessment, authorized under Section 18-A of the Public Service Law and dating back to the 1930s, was established as a nominal charge to support the operations of the state Public Service Commission.  Since the 1990s it has been expanded to provide dedicated funding for units of nine additional state agencies — including some far afield of energy policy, such as the Office of Real Property Services and the Department of Homeland Security.

The Section 18-A assessment is currently pegged at 0.33 percent of gross receipts and raises $120 million a year.  Paterson’s budget would temporarily raise the rate to 2 percent of gross receipts, a 643 percent increase, and deposit the added $652 million in the general fund.   After three years, the assessment would subside to a new permanent level of 1 percent of gross receipts.

If adopted, Paterson’s proposal would essentially resurrect the state’s old gross receipts tax, which was phased out in 2000.  Downstate and metropolitan New York City area customers of Consolidated Edison and National Grid (formerly KeySpan), would pay the bulk of the increase.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

Hochul’s ‘Straight Talk’ on Medicaid Isn’t Straight Enough

Arguably the biggest Medicaid news in Governor Hochul's budget presentation was about the current fiscal year, not the next one: The state-run health plan is running substantially over budget. Read More

New York’s Medicaid Spending Is Running Billions Over Budget

New York's Medicaid program ran billions of dollars over budget during the first half of the fiscal year, adding to signs of a brewing fiscal crisis in Albany. According to the fro Read More

Another battery flop zaps NY taxpayers

Plans to lure a Canadian battery company to the Hudson Valley with a slew of government incentives, including job-creation tax credits, loans, and federal subsidies, appear to be a dud. It’s a reminder that when it comes to picking winners in the energy-storage space, taxpayers are often losers. Read More

NYSERDA’s Roadmap to Nowhere  

New York school districts face a multi-billion dollar unfunded mandate to convert to electric school buses. While the transition will cost between $8 and $15 billion above the cost of buying traditional buses, less than $1 billion in state and federal aid is likely to be available to help schools cover the cost. Read More

New Wind Energy Costs Blow the Doors Off Projections

The myth that New York can replace fossil fuel power plants with cheap renewable energy has begun to crumble under renewable developers’ demands for higher prices to offset inflation and supply chain challenges.  Read More

Renewable Solar Comes with Recurring Waste Costs

Within 25 years New York will find itself trying to manage the disposal of five million or more waste solar panels every year. Read More

First Annual CLCPA Report Indicates High Costs, Low Benefits

A major deception on emissions reductions lies at the heart of the New York Department of Public Service’s first annual report on implementation of the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act. Read More

Micron vs. New York Energy Policy 

Computer chip manufacturer Micron has revealed that by the 2040s its Onondaga County factories are going to be sucking up enough electricity to power New Hampshire and Vermont combined. Read More