Home

Empire Center for
  Public Policy


Categories

Manhattan Institute
  for Policy Research

Fiscal Watch Memos

Payroll Watch Archive


   

Enter your e-mail address to receive notifications when there are new posts

 

 

 

January 10, 2013


A czar is born

E.J. McMahon

The latest wrinkles in Governor Andrew Cuomo’s green energy policy, as outlined yesterday in his third State of the State message, include a “cabinet level energy czar” recruited from the Obama administration.

Richard Kauffman, most recently a senior adviser to U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu, will head what the SoS described as a “newly formed energy subcabinet,”  with immediate responsibility for developing a NY Green Bank, seeded by $1 billion in funds already collected from energy ratepayers, to “leverage public dollars with a private-sector match to spur the clean economy … unleashing green technologies and the many benefits that will come with them.

No word on whether the new czar will relocate to Petersburg.

Missing links

In justifying the new post, Cuomo’s State of the State message cited the “need to reduce our consumption of energy that contributes to climate change” and for “a self-sustaining clean energy economy that will deliver both new jobs and cleaner air.”

But the message and the speech  contained not a word about tapping the vast reservoir of natural gas trapped deep below ground in upstate New York.  And so, while the outlook for hydro-fracking in the New York’s portion of the Marcellus Shale region remains unclear, the administration’s strategy for reviving upstate’s economy still consists mainly of various government “investments,” enhanced marketing, and headline-grabbers like a national whitewater rafting competition  and casino gambling (if approved in a voter referendum).

Another big concern left unmentioned in this year’s State of the State was mandate relief. Local county, municipal and school officials throughout the state, Democrats and Republicans alike, have been clamoring for changes in state laws that drive up employee compensation costs by giving unions excessive leverage in contrast talks.  It’s all still no-go with the gov. Instead, there’s this:

[W]e must also continue to provide advice and assistance to local governments on how to restructure local finances. Therefore Governor Cuomo will create Financial Restructuring Assistance Program, which will be available to all local governments (counties, cities, towns, and villages) to help them restructure their finances. The program will be run by a joint Task Force made up of the Comptroller, Attorney General, Division of Budget, and private-sector restructuring consultants.

But local governments don’t need to “restructure their finances” (a phrase that implies something like debt consolidation).  They need to spend less.   And the governor still won’t give them more of the tools they need to do it.

Filed under: Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Uncategorized

2 Comments »

  1. E.J.
    Any word on whether Mr. Kauffman will be issued a nifty uniform?

    Be well,

    Tom

    Comment by Tom Grant — January 10, 2013 @ 12:38 pm

  2. Will you please refrain from utilizing the euphemism “mandate relief” when referring to the problem of overregulation? I am not sure when the term was created, but here in New Rochelle, NY it seems to have achieved “mantra” status when local politicians, school board members etc. want to complain about Albany without accomplishing anything. My guess is that school boards and teachers’ unions decided that it would sound too right-wing to charge the Assembly and Senate with over-legislating, so “mandate relief” was adopted as the polite way for decent Democrats and liberals to refer to the problem.

    Why don’t good, ordinary conservatives identify the problem for what it is; Albany administrators, bureaucrats and legislators loading up local school boards, police departments, city hall public works departments etc. with all manner of social welfare and feel-good rules and regulation on the cheap without providing any funding for it; for the private benefit of politicians, favored employee groups and political action committees. (This is not intended to endorse the subject legislation and rule-making; some of it is well-intentioned, some is plain wrong and wasteful of the public treasury and much of it intended only for the benefit of contributor unions, industry associations, professional societies, contractors and individuals; some of it might even be good and helpful to the public weal. I am here only commenting on the crooked way of going about it).

    To use the euphemism of the free-spenders, and allied politicians, public employee unions and credulous voters is to literally give up the fight before the battle has been joined. Let free-thinking fiscal skinflints of all political stripes call the beast what it is; over-regulation, misregulation and the plain old-fashioned and corrupt purchase of New York state legislation.

    Comment by Stephen Mayo — January 14, 2013 @ 12:37 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

 

 
 

Empire Center for Public Policy
P.O. Box 7113 - Albany, New York 12224
phone: 518-434-3100