Home

Empire Center for
  Public Policy


Categories

Manhattan Institute
  for Policy Research

Fiscal Watch Memos

Payroll Watch Archive


   

Enter your e-mail address to receive notifications when there are new posts

 

 

 

March 3, 2011


Public Payroll Watch

Tim Hoefer

Governor Cuomo proposed a cap on Superintendent salaries earlier this week, but as it relates to bringing school district spending down, it’s the equivalent of trying to chop down a tree with nail clippers.

Take, for example, the Rochester City School District, which is facing an $82 million budget gap this year. While the 2011-12 proposed budget hasn’t been released, the 2010-11 final budget has $694 million in spending, so if spending remains flat, the district has to make up or cut an astounding 12 percent of its budget.

According to his contract, Superintendent Jean-Claude Brizard’s salary is $235,000.  If the cap were enacted and Bizard’s contract ended this year, he’d be in line for a $60,000 pay cut.  Probably substantial for him, but just peanuts for the district.  That $60,000 represents just .07 percent of this year’s projected gap. (School labor contracts and earning data, including Bizard’s, are available on SeeThroughNY).

On the other hand, if the thousands of district teachers agreed to forego their 2.5 percent “step increment” raises, the district could cover more than $5 million of its projected budget gap. That’s over 6 percent of the gap – and $5 million worth of potential layoffs that could be avoided.

The teachers union hasn’t yet settled their contract that expired last year, which is likely OK by them considering a tanked economy and provisions of the Taylor Law that keep the raises coming.

So Cuomo’s proposal is one idea, it just isn’t enough or the right first step to get massive school budgets under control.  Cuomo should be urging school districts and unions to go back to the bargaining table, giving them a chainsaw … or at least an ax.

2 Comments »

  1. Correct, it’s only .07% of the overall budget, but the fact that everyone is going to contribute to the total amount is much more significant. Look at the districts in the state where teachers have agreed to a pay freeze and their relationship with the Bd. of Ed and Superintendent where they too have taken a freeze. It’s not just one thing or the other, but the combined efforts of everyone. So yes, cap the superintendents, and forgo step increases and freeze salaries until the legislature can inact remeidal reforms on unions.

    Comment by Florence Alpert — March 3, 2011 @ 12:43 pm

  2. Amen! I couldnt have said it better.

    Comment by Kristina Kucker — March 4, 2011 @ 6:47 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

 

 
 

Empire Center for Public Policy
P.O. Box 7113 - Albany, New York 12224
phone: 518-434-3100